You are here:
Vanderbilt Biostatistics Wiki
>
Main Web
>
TwoStageIntroduction
(revision 1) (raw view)
Edit
Attach
---++ Making Inference from a Simon's Two-stage Design in Phase II Clinical Trials by [[TatsukiKoyama][Tatsuki Koyama]] -------- [[#TwoStageIntroductionIntroduction][Introduction]] [[#TwoStageIntroductionBackground][Background]] [[TwoStageInferenceTechnical][Technical Details]] [[#TwoStageIntroductionReference][Reference]] --------- #TwoStageIntroductionIntroduction ---+++ Introduction Two-stage designs are commonly used in phase II clinical trials (especially in cancer clinical trials). Simon (1989) proposed two criteria (minimax and optimal) for selecting sample sizes and critical values for these two-stage designs. _Simon's_ two stage designs are very popular; the paper by Simon has been cited for more than 500 times. Despite its popularity, a two-stage design lacks easy-to-use tools for making inference once the data are collected. Although these two-stage designs are primarily for decision making and estimation is usually not a primary objective of a phase II trial it may be preferable to compute a pvalue, a confidence interval and an unbiased estimate of the true response rate at the termination of the trial. We are currently developing [[TwoStage InferenceR][R / Splus programs]] (still improving - 7/5/05) and [[http://www.vicc.org/biostatistics/simon/twostage.php][web-based programs]] (under construction - 6/3/05 programmer [[WillGray][Will Gray]]) to compute an "honest" pvalue, confidence interval and unbiased estimate from a two-stage design in phase II clinical trial. --------- [[#TwoStageIntroductionIntroduction][Introduction]] [[#TwoStageIntroductionBackground][Background]] [[TwoStageInferenceTechnical][Technical Details]] [[#TwoStageIntroductionReference][Reference]] --------- #TwoStageIntroductionBackground ---+++ Background In a typical two-stage trail, %$n_1$% patients are enrolled in stage I. If the number of responses is fewer than or equal to prespecified %$r_1$%, the trial is terminated for lack of efficacy. Otherwise an additional %$n_2$% patients are enrolled in stage II. The total number of patients is %$n_t \equiv n_1 + n_2$%. If the cumulative number of responses are fewer than or equal to %$r_t$%, then lack of efficacy is concluded. Otherwise, it is concluded that the treatment is sufficiently effective for further investigation. A two-stage design is indexed by four numbers, %$n_1,\,r_1,\,n_t,\,r_t$%. These numbers are chosen so that the probability of concluding efficacy when the treatment is not effective is less than %$\alpha$% and the probability of concluding futility when the treatment is effective is less than %$\beta$%. For a given %$p_0,\,p_1$%, there are many designs, i.e., %$n_1,\, r_1,\, n_t,\, r_t$% that satisfy %$\alpha$% and %$\beta$% conditions. Following are candidates for _good_ designs among them. 1. The *optimal* design has the minimum expected sample size under %$H_0: p=p_0$%. 1. The *minimax* design has the smallest %$n_t$%. 1. The *balanced* design has %$n_1 = n_2$%. ([[http://www.vicc.org/biostatistics/freqapp.php][reference]] Ye and [[YuShyr][Shyr]]) There are softwares capable of finding these designs given %$p_0,\,p_1,\,\alpha,\,\beta$%. One such software is developed and maintained by Fei Ye (ye_fei_cn@yahoo.com) and freely available [[http://www.vicc.org/biostatistics/uncorrelateddesign.php][here.]] ([[http://www.vicc.org/biostatistics/][Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Biostatistics Shared Resource]]) Jung et al. (2004) proposed *admissible* designs that lie somewhere between the optimal and minimax designs and have favorable characteristics in terms of both the expected and maximum sample sizes. They have also created a software that is capable of finding the optimal, minimax and admissible --------- [[#TwoStageIntroductionIntroduction][Introduction]] [[#TwoStageIntroductionBackground][Background]] [[TwoStageInferenceTechnical][Technical Details]] [[#TwoStageIntroductionReference][Reference]] --------- ---+++Technical Details See [[TwoStageInferenceTechnical][here]]. #TwoStageIntroductionReference ---+++ Reference 1. Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. _Controlled Clinical Trials_ 1989; *10*: 1 - 10. 1. Jung SH, Lee T, Kim KM, George SL. Admissible two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials. _Statistics in Medicine_ 2004; *23*: 561 - 569. 1. Armitage P. Resticted Sequential Procedures. _Biometrika_ 1957; *44*: 9 - 56. 1. Jung SH, Kim KM. On the estimation of the binomial probability in multistage clinical triasl. _Statistics in Medicine_ 2004; *23*: 881 - 896. 1. Whitehead J. On the bias of maximum likelihood estimation following a sequential test. _Biometrika_ 1986; *73*: 573 - 581.
Edit
|
Attach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
:
r4
<
r3
<
r2
<
r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Edit WikiText
|
More topic actions...
Topic revision: r1 - 06 Dec 2006,
TatsukiKoyama
Main
Department Home Page
Biostatistics Graduate Program
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Main Web
Main Web Home
Search
Recent Changes
Changes
Topic list
Biostatistics Webs
Archive
Main
Sandbox
System
Register
|
Log In
Copyright © 2013-2022 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Vanderbilt Biostatistics Wiki?
Send feedback