You are here:
Vanderbilt Biostatistics Wiki
>
Main Web
>
Seminars
>
WednesdaySeminarSeries
>
BethanyWolf082416
(09 Aug 2016,
AshleeBartley
)
(raw view)
E
dit
A
ttach
---++ Department of Biostatistics Seminar/Workshop Series ---+ *Selection of Optimal Cut-Points to Dichotomize Continuous Predictors to Discriminate Disease Status* <span style="color: limegreen;"><span style="font-size: 20.3px; line-height: 1.1em; background-color: transparent;">Bethany J. Wolf, </span><span style="font-size: 20.3px; line-height: 1.1em;">PhD</span></span><span style="color: #339900; font-size: 20.3px; line-height: 1.1em; background-color: transparent;">, Assistant Professor of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Science, Medical University of South Carolina</span> Continuous variables are often dichotomized to develop decision tools in clinical practice. However, development of complex diseases may be influenced by interactions between genetic and environmental factors. Appropriate clinical management of a patient requires consideration of these factors when assessing patient risk for disease. If true cut-points for one or more continuous variables exist, the challenge is identifying them. We first examine common methods for dichotomization to identify which methods recover a true cut-point. We provide mathematical and numeric proofs demonstrating that maximizing the odds ratio, Youden's statistic, Gini Index, chi-square statistic, relative risk and kappa statistic all theoretically recover a true cut-point. A simulation study evaluating the ability of these statistics to recover a cut-point when sampling from a population indicates that maximizing the chi-square statistic and Gini Index have the smallest bias and variability while the maximizing odds ratio is the most variable and biased of the methods. While these methods can be shown to recover a true cut-point, there is limited methodology for simultaneously optimizing cut-points for 2 or more variables. Thus we also propose a method for jointly dichotomizing two or more variables and conduct simulations to compare joint and marginal dichotomization for the ability to recover the correct cut-points. Our results show that, in most scenarios, cut-points selected jointly exhibit smaller mean square error and similar bias relative to those selected marginally.
E
dit
|
A
ttach
|
P
rint version
|
H
istory
: r1
|
B
acklinks
|
V
iew topic
|
Edit
w
iki text
|
M
ore topic actions
Topic revision: r1 - 09 Aug 2016,
AshleeBartley
Main
Department Home Page
Biostatistics Graduate Program
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Main Web
Main Web Home
Search
Recent Changes
Changes
Topic list
Biostatistics Webs
Archive
Main
Sandbox
System
Register
|
Log In
Copyright © 2013-2022 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Vanderbilt Biostatistics Wiki?
Send feedback