PLEASE NOTE: This seminar is in Light Hall 214

Biostatistics Weekly Seminar

A Brief History of Time … at Risk: A Review of Competing Risk Methods. Or, Who’s Right, Who’s Wrong, and Who Cares?

Peter Rebeiro, PhD, MHS
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

Survival analysis may not be so straightforward if a study participant’s time at risk for the outcome can be truncated by some other event (often death). How do we deal with this sort of censoring? And why do we use the methods we do? I’ll review the motivation for thinking of censoring due to a competing event a little differently than other sorts of censoring, the parsing of risk sets in the presence of a competing event, and the assumptions underlying a few different competing risk methods. I’ll also provide a brief example of these methods applied in a few different contexts.

Light Hall 214
22 August 2018

Speaker Itinerary

Topic revision: r4 - 15 Aug 2018, ThomasStewart

This site is powered by FoswikiCopyright © 2013-2022 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding Vanderbilt Biostatistics Wiki? Send feedback